Charlotte Male Brazilian Waxing

Malaise

Grillini and purple people first, then squats, of anti-left and radical left, burst in Turin at the Feast National Democratic Party: What's happening to the party Bersani, and will not inspire more people to the left of that mythical than that once the PCI, however, could be maintained? After the verbal protests against the president of the Senate Renato Schifani, the time of the trade unionist Angelo Bonanni, received by the first social centers with whistles, shouts - "Money is a good servant and a bad master", "Marchionne Bonanni commands and obeys" - and throwing fake banknotes, then joined by a smoke bomb that burned the jacket without hurting him. And Enrico Letta, as well as Fassino, stunned to cry out: "You have nothing to do with democracy. You'll need the opposite of the country. You are anti-democratic. " And the next comment from the Secretary Pierluigi Bersani: "It was an act of intimidation and actual violence, an assault squad. It is conceivable that a popular festival, which lives in the heart of the city, can be attacked in this way. Expect to know by the Interior Ministry which preventive and repressive measures have been taken to prevent any such incident. " Of course, that is, as said the president of the Senate, an intolerable act that negates the democracy and must be utterly condemned, but it should reflect the PD at the end.

There is an evident malaise in the party. Evident from the statements of leaders of the most authoritative lackeys, thickening of the many administrators that the ranks of the leadership at every level. Reflected by the numerous statements of militants who have television broadcast, as news and how color, after the foul deed, that "the party of the Unit would not have happened," heard over and over again by fellow always hurt living today the prefix 'ex' that the epithet was used to attack.

The impression is that the creation of the Democratic Party with this radical departure from the left wanted to be as precise Veltroni political calculation to disappear permanently from politics Parliamentary Union's former allies uncomfortable, which led to a victory but also ensure the rapid collapse, has had at the end of a major cost for the party, to put it in a sort of "layoff" policy, pending a future location, no one knows when, who knows where. Without leadership expendable, so much so that Vendola no coincidence as it is proposed to do in Puglia by Moses to the promised land of a permanent government. Without a concrete plan innovative. And do not say otherwise. Just read any statement which speaks of the empty hands and a search for something, that gives a minimum identity of start, always, from the high level of the secretariat at the lowest level of the small insignificant provincial executive. And a separation, then, growing from citizens, from their daily lives, their needs, from a society in continuous evolution frantic, blinded by a deadly antiberlusconismo internally and turbid current games.

Luca Canova is a director of the minority Democratic Party in the Province of Lodi. In his blog he writes on the state of the art of party considerations particularly worthy of attention. His analysis starts from the day's topic, the last rabbit out of the cylinder on the theme of "destruction" of Berlusconi, and Future of Freedom, but finding similarities on how to interpret the current Italian society, or rather the inability to interpret them, arrives inevitably to talk of his party. Canova writes: "'The Democratic Party was created to unite two reforms," it was said some time ago, generously forgetting that the left is the objectively represented a centrist conservative axis, in Italy. The convolutions in which the Democratic Party struggles are the best confirmation: instead combine the best of the content originating reformist parties (I know: the proximity to the workers of the DS and the social solidarity of the Margherita), we compare and contrast the worst of old legacy (I know: some greedy Democrats to public office and an incomprehensible cult of personality for the area ex-Ds). The result: a risottone sciapo not even like the most ardent activists. " And try to answer the obvious question of why to happen, "Why also prevails in the left conservatism and conformism of a fund that automatically makes it heretical and worthy of ostracism or terminating any proposal courageous courageously the problems and solutions. Look to the issue of DICO, or the case Englaro, or the laws on the rights of couples, the RU-486 but you look above the laws passed along these lines Sanfedists ideological. " It properly asks the question: "How can we think, reasonably, to be" political alternative "if you do not propose alternative policy solutions?". Very fair.

E Canova replied: "You can not, and it is lost. Obvious result of a strategy that is in itself a loser, chasing the myth of a class moderate medium that does not exist and, if it exists, has already chosen to believe the worst European right, as at that time not twisted his mouth in front of Mussolini's operetta, the attacks of the Cosa Nostra, to the brink of a public. A moderate middle class that exists only in the minds of political scientists by living, there is no middle class in Italy, if middle class means a secular middle class, educated, liberal and European. And there is no moderation in that lump that social class is coming, but only a rough and fierce extremism. " And inevitably concludes: "We, in pursuit of this myth, we have lost credibility and consent."

One of the myths under discussion in the Democratic Party is the so-called "vocation majority. " What is meant by the term is explained Piero Fassino interviewed a few days ago by Europe: 'The vocation of the majority means that the PD must have a broad consensus, but that is not exclusive and that has the ability to lead a coalition. Nobody ever thought you could take 51 percent. " With a similar vision of the "task is clear that, as Fassino said," The knot of alliances is inescapable. Across Europe, the model is multi-pole: in Italy there are not two parties but the two coalitions. "

A move to new waters in this direction was recently Veltroni. 'Notes nostalgic understandable, because it has linked its experience leading to the season. But the call is a major policy thoroughly tested and unfortunately plenty of defeat. If this is the interpretation of Veltroni, is a return back, "says Nicola Latorre, vice president of voice dalemiana and senators of the Democratic Party, interviewed by The Morning . Latorre said: "The nostalgia for a two-party system is legitimate, but the case was filed by Congress and by the facts. And Congress is not done to waste time. There are different hypotheses are compared and an indication of the electoral law was clear: we need a way to return to citizens the choice of the elect, do not retreat from the system of alternate, non-institutionalized a two-party rejected by the Italian company. " Well not wanting to see at home, in the vacuum of the proposal, the cause of defeat, "invents" the law that elected Prodi 'stops the relationship between voters and elected "- seemed to all then something is wrong - but especially that law "is born as a law of a majority imposed on a minority." True, but the "crap" of a Calderoli was so filthy that he won his first-time opponent of his coalition.

Then there is the question of leadership. Figures like the mayors of Turin and Florence, and Renzi are Chiamparino school and revived ambitions of others. Even in our country where it seems to materialize the project within the Democratic Party to a wave of labor and management. Ambitions rise in ranking is attributed to the party Guerini, Mayor of Lodi, which screens: "I have a commitment as mayor of this city and I intend to carry it forward." And it's one that says: "It takes a great project for Italy and renewal. The party does not abandon his vocation and the majority do not lose too much tactics in formulas that are losing momentum of the program, "which does not seem right in line with the secretariat Bersani. And again: "Certainly the issue of alliances can not be eluded, but I think it is necessary to make a step forward. Fini propose as our ally can not believe in line with the mission we set ourselves when we started the adventure of the Democratic Party. The problem is not put together many forces, but think about a project and the reformist majority, in this logic we should equip ourselves because we could not make it, but I think that the direction is the right one. " Some, like Colizzi, president of the Lodi City Council, the "current" of Mayors believes, hoping that the Democratic Party nationally, "can really enhance administrators who apply," as in the case of Guerini. "There being no more school parties, local authorities are now the true fitness of the new ruling class," says Colizzi. Hoping that is not a blinding summer.

Brazilchicken Wings Wholesale Price

Rai pride


I must make a confession:
dear friends, boys, men of hair, is not enough for your commitment, sweat, testosterone paid to combat this weakness ... in the end we are I also fell: I saw Brokeback Mountain.
not judge me, I accepted the risk of being infected just for my uncontrollable passion for cinema that offense right now, I finally forced them to close the gap.
When I have not experienced any side effects. My pants have not yet tested their resilience in the face of a calf from kicker, let alone in front of the chest of the first Bruce Willis television, and if now, I can still boast of virginity of all my orifices I owe it to the more orthodox and total respect for the status that we all have signed Studs at birth. But I asked myself, I would still

saved by RAI MOVIE frocitudine if he had forwarded the full version? If he had not cut the kissing scene and effusions from ricchione I would have kept the integrity of Italian male?
I wonder why do not I right about that decision by a television channel devoted exclusively to film and television that promotes itself as the exhibition of the Venice Film Festival. What justifies the child cut a few scenes where innocent not the fact that they are homosexual love?
do not understand why if you see some 'Lino Banfi (utmost respect) that looks through the keyhole that if Gloria Guida lathers the potato is deemed objectionable and a kiss between two men. I do not understand why Scarlett Signorini can give advice rather than from morning to night for Italian families would be eligible but not see them kiss ... ok now it's clear to me, I did not read the link.

Motorola V9 Install Tv

The ballet

"We're not British. But this does not justify the ballet - the majority, opposition, President of the Republic - that we go on stage whenever a crisis of government, "wrote Peter Ostellino few weeks ago on Corriere della Sera. He added: "Nor shall perform media are rooting for the parties to the conflict and pull the President of the Republic for his coat, pretending to defend the prerogatives or to discuss it." In short, says Ostellino 'institutions hold water on all sides. If they are not adapting to the "spirit of time" the state machine goes out of laps. "

What is the kernel of question is obvious: "Article 1 of the Constitution states:" Sovereignty belongs to the people and is exercised in the manner and within the limits of the Constitution. " It is not up to the elected by the people, who have only the exercise, put limits on popular sovereignty. What procedures should not be an obstacle, but its full realization. The subject is the sovereignty, not the forms and limits within which the people exercise it. " Ostellino says: "This is what Constantine had this death - the great constitutionalist who had put in a beautiful calligraphy paper messy - when talking about practice (what we today call improperly" material constitution "). That he intended as opposed to "formal constitution, but in its integration."

the reality of things, the Stresses notista, the trouble comes from the fact that "our institutional system of constitutional monarchy is a parody of the nineteenth century, when King had the last word and representative democracy was in its infancy. The part of the King is the President of the Republic in a political context that is not the same in which the monarchy. But his "prerogatives", as such, they end up having an even wider margin of appreciation of the "powers" codified the sovereign. " Ostellino explains: "First of all, the king was considered" above the parties ", although Then, it was not at all. Not so with the president. By the mere fact that they belonged to a political party, who has stated and voted, he is inevitably perceived as a "party man". Moreover, biased, and not infrequently they have been - more or less explicitly - all tenants of the Quirinal. Secondly, its very function is to "filter" of the legislative process - referring to the holding room bills for breach of constitutionality - ends up being perceived, rather than a guarantee, an undue interference in the work of government and independence of the Parliament itself. "

notista of The Courier compare our with the British system, where "no one would suggest that the conspiracy against the queen's first minister in charge." Among the many differences that are listed, there is also the one in England is the prime minister who decides whether the country still enjoys the consensus that has lost in Parliament, to dissolve the Chambers and call new elections. "Who, for us, has proposed such an institutional system has been accused of fascism by the custodians of the (very poor) sacred knowledge 'is the net Ostellino comment, adding:" The newspapers supporters of the center - who is afraid of losing them - are against any early elections for a parliamentary majority and an alternative to Output from the polls. Too bad that the same view when not in play is a different government, acceptable to them. They say the pure parliamentary system, without a binding mandate, it would be a guarantee for the independence of the parliamentary party than oligarchies. Too bad the reality is the opposite. Article 67 of the Constitution - "Every member of Parliament represents the Nation and carries out his duties without a binding mandate" - deprives the people of its sovereignty, as it entrusts the operation at the discretion of their representatives, giving an institutional character elitist, oligarchic, and authoritarian-change in representative democracy so understood. " Very true. But the article

of Ostellino contains an illuminating passage on the events of the past month and a half, concerning the conduct of Mr institutional. Fini. Ostellino writes: "In Anglo-Saxon institutional systems, who presides over the work of a branch of Parliament is the Speaker . His is a "work" - His or her job , he says of his role - which is to give voice to those who ask. It is quite unthinkable that will be in competition with the prime minister, build a separate parliamentary group and promotes its "political" than those of the government. If Speaker of British House of Commons he did, nobody would ask for his resignation. Would end up in a mental hospital. " According to the notista

Courier, "to defend the existing institutional system were the followers of political and social elites fundamentally hostile to liberal democracy. People believe that democracy should not be "government of the people" - even if exercised by their representatives - but the Republic of Plato's philosophy, the ethical status of Hegel, the "general will" of Rousseau, the "vanguard of the proletariat, Marxist Leninist. And reaction, senile disease of liberalism. "

Another piece of the article by Piero Ostellino be collected to demonstrate the absurdity in the center of a political attitude propagated from above and accepted by based militant uncritically. Ostellino says: "I had always thought that the (only) way to change governments without bloodshed were, in democracy, free elections. But it seems that many do not think so. My readers want to drive on the left (...) Berlusconi, but also add they do not want to vote. Count, if the government falls, the President of the Republic does not mean new elections and are confident in the "rigging" the parliamentary opposition. A peculiar case of abdication of its sovereignty. " Really! But Ostellino goes down even harder to reason: "I wonder if, at this rate, will not come to the abolition of elections when there was the prospect of a win are "Others". " You just turn a bit 'in the streets of small villages where the patrolling party, to understand that this will not put us two minutes to take shape, perhaps even for the local authorities.

Varicose Veins On Labia Minora

and Padania Terroni

Speaking

Mr. Gianfranco Fini and the latest events that have rocked Italian politics, one can not pretend that the story of the house of Monaco does not exist, maybe not so much the fact itself, which if confirmed would be nothing but a bad business of many of our politicians as for the way it was and is still in an interview Tuesday in Mentone, run. Particularly disdainful toward the sovereignty of the people of which one stands as a bulwark, it has every right to have a word from those who voted not clear immediately and indefinitely for the Judiciary. You can not pretend it does not exist, but close it there with the words of Luciano Sardelli, a member of the South that we interview in almost a month ago, issued Il Giornale, succinctly summarized: "No. Did not clarify anything at all. The story does water start to finish. It sold an apartment in Monaco, but is sold to an offshore company. who is behind this company? And how come the price is so low? And why refuse An offer much more attractive? And then I do not think that Fini did not know anything about the final destination of the house. We live in-law and he falls from the clouds. Embarrassing. " A situation "more serious than that which led to the resignation Scajola Home at the Coliseum. Here there is far more complex, "adds Pilcher, who in 1996 was deployed to counter Tatarella Pinuccio by Massimo D'Alema nell'inespugnabile Gallipoli and we went close with 45 percent of the vote.

The evocation of the South Member of We is not the case, especially for a sentence of the interview, "Fini does not represent us any more," that if you have a reference in the context of its institutional role, it can, given the political overtones of 'Mr Pilcher, offer the opportunity for a wider extension, so to speak, territorial. In the speech of Mirabello, read it carefully, it is clear that Fini itself as the leader of a sort of league as opposed to South Bossi. The rest already, so to speak, in very difficult times, in early August, Gaetano Quagliarella, vice president of PDL senators, in an interview with Il Sole 24 Ore , pointed out the obvious: "It is clear that an independent center will configured as part of the South because the electorate there is more mobile, therefore, is a ground of challenge that is worth a lot. And they will try to crush the positions of the League for credit as the new partners, in the name of national unity. " Quagliarella then declared the will of the PDL not to be the sacrificial victim of the whole affair, "But we will not snatch this battle. Only the PDL has a national identity, "and listed the difficulties of the battle:" Of course, we calibrate the right to request a public opinion of the North, impatient to an abuse of public spending, with a change in the South but not you can do with a magic wand: used as a social safety net spending, has often transformed into rights that is difficult to eliminate. We will have to work on contractual policies territorial tax advantages. "

A design, as feared, now in the sunlight. South against North, the Troika Fini-Bossi Rutelli-Casini against the Berlusconi's corpse? Political fiction, even if it has the charm of a possible development. It will go to vote. When he speaks of covenant of term, Fini is not credible, the same tone of voice betrays him, Mirabella, from Mentone to Tg La7. He feels that it is fake, acted to make people believe that voted him as co-founder of the PDL, a "no want of respect, I am not the first who threw the stone." But if the vote, which most probably will, come out as a Senate that has sunk Prodi? The Freedom Party is the only truly national party of the boot and unifying. Dead, what will happen? We celebrate the hundred and fifty years of unity by returning to the borders the post-1943, removed from the Allied victory? Italy finally splitting in two? Padania and Terroni? So how is putting Fini, the sample without value of national unity, is a prospect that is materializing on the horizon, an impalpable mist that can suddenly become consistent. But certainly, let's say to calm, if you trust the people Italic, which shows to know how to "govern" a lot better than they do their politicians, you can sleep soundly, and classify such cases as mere fantasies.