Friday, October 29, 2010

South Park Studios Buffering

The unsinkable

The sesquicentennial of Masonic unity lies Italy and Berlusconi is still there, the former piduista, yes, but the "traitor" who embodies the anti 'state Masonic "par excellence. Each failed attack on the government, "here we go again with the chick," as he wrote on Friday 29 Belpietro Free , adding: "We had already tried in the summer of 2008, making wiretaps leaked from the Prime Minister and the Director finction of the RAI. Then they tried again last year, first with Letizia and later with Patrick D'Addario. Now check Ruby, the attractive 17 year old Moroccan who had participated in at least three dinners at Arcore, This Silvio Berlusconi and other characters, many of whom are women. But to discover that the knight like women did not have to wait until the last revelation. " Each crowbar is fine but to undermine Prime Minister's office and send him home. Now it is understood, all the Italians have got it right, even if many Turano his nose in front of the worms in a sling while to take the power that is available and willing to send the country to the dogs. And now that Italy has understood the game, the polls are showing that in the face of every sinister effort to discredit the prime minister, did not show to give faith to the barbarians and all'antiberlusconismo visceral opponents who try to make iron Arcore and fire. Not There is no alternative short of pace from Bettola Bersani cabaret comedians and other Democrats.
The latest Ipsos poll done for the October 25 episode of BallarĂ² of 26 October 2010 and concerned leaders, government action, justice, waste and emergency declarations Marchionne, is relentless: there ' is no alternative today to the Knight. The "clique" Masonic shape must accept it and celebrate the sesquicentennial of his "unity" of the country with Prime Minister Berlusconi and the League to the government.
But we see some aspects of the survey that are worthy of attention and reflection, beginning with the figure of those who, in the event of new elections soon and declare themselves undecided or to abstain or do not indicate any preference, a significant fact, 42.5%, which clearly shows that, if there are doubts as to the majority, is now also clear that "the emperor has no clothes' as regards the 'shabby opposition Democratic Party. Indeed, the figure for the democrat is alarming, 24.2%, the lowest ever. But other data on the left and populist forces with opposition such as Italy and the Movement of the values \u200b\u200bof 5 stars Grillo contributing to sink the joyous war machine Bersani: European Left, that PRC and the Italian Communists, 2.3 % Left and freedom of Vendola 6.1%, Di Pietro, with its IDV 8.3% Grillo and his movement 3.7%. All together they make a nice 20.4%. If this does not mean the failure of the secretariat Bersani, what else should be decreed. It is no coincidence that gasping for not drown permanently democrat invoke a reversal that would give them an illusory opportunity to get back on track in the race for consent even if you should explain how consensus can produce a kind of coup against the expression of popular will which would be a caretaker government.
The survey gives a constant 6.0% UDC and attests to the freedom and Future 5.3%. This raises the question as if it would be against such a shift in alliance with Finian 'impossible' with democrat. Not to mention the "third pole", which is only a sham parliament, as Rutelli and his covenant is 'not received', it is grouped in the survey that 2.5% of 'others'.
short, single electoral chances could come from a mysterious neo Union, because if phantom set up by the Democratic Party would renege on an ocean of words. That is the definitive choice veltroniana disgraced and, therefore, the rejection of the creation of the party 'new'.
The Right: PDL to 29%, it is a bit ', so nothing new alloy 11.3% 1.3% The Right. Together, 41.6%, slightly more than twice the consent of the Pd.
The Ipsos survey also expresses appreciation for the political leaders here we show that using more significantly as an indicator but not the percentage ratio between positive and negative scores: 4.82 Napolitano, Tremonti 1.16; Vendola 1.13; Fini 0, 94; Bersani 0.84; Beppe Grillo 0.74, 0.69 Berlusconi, Casini 0.67; Schifani 0.63; Di Pietro 0.59; Bossi 0.42. It also provides the approval for some political leaders do not: Luca Cordero di Montezemolo 1.19; Marcegaglia 1.36; Dragons 1.79; Marchionne 0.75. Because the data in the rating, it can be suspected of being in front of a sample oriented to the left, as the usual disputes between members of the center and Pagnoncelli suggest. But if so, the information 'won' by democrat would be even more alarming and catastrophic.
The curious thing of the survey include specific questions, such as those on the activities of government. According to the Ipsos asking: "For over two years since taking office, she personally would say that, overall, the Berlusconi government has disappointed the ...», would be 54%, only the satisfied 16%, while those who believe that it is too early to judge the 25%. Yet despite these declarations, the same sample still gives Berlusconi the numbers to get out from winning any elections soon. Same for the question: "In recent days, the minister Tremonti has announced the development of a comprehensive reform tax. Do you personally think that the government be able to finish it by 2013, the expiration of the term? ", 26% said yes, 65% said no, and despite this obvious lack of confidence in the ability of the government the same sample gives the Berlusconi numbers to govern. Mysteries of the polls.
Not only that, on the advice of the Ipsos BallarĂ² calls to standard: "Let's talk about the so-called Lodo Alfano Bis. She personally believes that this award is ... "and only 14% think it is" a necessary measure: it is important to protect the Prime Minister of every possible form of persecution by the judiciary, "while 25% think it ' loss time takes away resources and energy to solving real problems of the country, "but as much as 53% declared him" a shame, yet another ad personam laws to take away from Berlusconi's legal problems. " Yet the same sample offers the possibility of Silvio Berlusconi to return to the premier event of early elections. A paradox highlighted by the second question: "To go out once and for all from the question of justice, according to her in this situation ...», 64%, in fact, believes that" Berlusconi should give up any possible shield and agree to celebrate processes that are involved demonstrating its complete innocence, "while only 27% believe that" you should pass a specific law enabling Berlusconi to delay the processes involved see it at the end of his term as Premier. " Yet, despite having the opportunity to declare their intention to vote with the will to send him home to stand trial, the same sample gives the numbers to continue to hold the government.
final question concerned the case Marchionne and Fiat and 60% of respondents said they did not believe that without Italy's Fiat accounts would be much more positive. Granted, but more interesting the next question on the 'delay' of Italy: half of the sample 50% said they believe that Italian politics in recent years has protected categories less efficient for political advantage, the 16% that unions are too ideological, 14% that employers have not invested to improve it. For 80% of the sample, in short, the entire leadership of the nation is to be thrown overboard. Comforting. Good sesquicentennial.

Saturday, October 9, 2010

Facebook Group Officer

finiano

It was stressed several times that day and the Future Freedom is a parliamentary force, but not yet an electoral force. The distinction is no small thing, and although many generous polls tend to credit the "future" to help provide a value in the territory so as to give it a little bit more than 7 percent in the voting intentions of those surveyed, this does not seem credible, and for a number of reasons, the future of party funding to support local positions within the PDL, and its divisions, generally non-existent. Navigated between parliamentarians, in short, the "secession" there can be, then I used to stay afloat whatever happens, not so at the peripheral level where it seems rather rely on the good old saying "those who leave the old road for the new, know what to write , what is not, "or" better an egg today than a hen tomorrow, "to be invented.
The Lodi is one example. Here, the futurist party of Fini is embodied in one person, Matthew Papa, "the" finiano, put out in recent days by the people of the freedom of Lodi. Giancarlo Gifts, vice-coordinator of the PDL, on behalf of the party leaders meeting Wednesday 6, informed the press that: "Given the emergence of the group and that Papa confirms adherence to this group, despite the legitimacy of that choice, Management believes the provincial policy coherence for the impossibility to continue the business of City Council member of the PDL. " Of course, the tone may indicate that a 'policy coherence', the board should resign and make way for more elected in the PDL, but since they are not so usual things go, Papa left the group to join another council or group mixed, depending on what is required by Regulation Lodi City Council.
Greta Boni, the columns of the Citizen , tells us that Matthew Papa, the expelled, has not much liked the way it has been driven, above all, learn the news of his expulsion talking to the parent council of the PDL, Sergio Tadi, "This is the level of democracy within the PDL, I believe that in a situation like this it is necessary first to consult the people involved, trying to understand their mptivazioni, giving the opportunity to respond, and also because the Future Freedom is a party that is still forming. It is worthy of expulsion of a Soviet party, I wonder why at the national level are not squeezed corrupt and mafiosi and prefer to expel me. " The same
Boni adds that within the PDL more than one person has welcomed the decision of the Board. The base is compact and Lodi who come from the ranks of An are all now 'larussiani' for their defense minister is considered the true point of reference. Gifts, which, says Boni, ironically wished to "cast" as "a brilliant political career," he commented, "There's still the danger of going to elections, everything will depend on how it will behave Fli. I bitterly condemn the behavior of Fini, not for the "Monte Carlo event, but for the political turncoat: us ferried in PDL, then he wanted to be Speaker of the House, losing the political clout at that time was central to all the former An. If you go to vote and run Fini himself, in alliance with the third pole, I hope that people are not shortsighted. "

Friday, October 8, 2010

Whatis Gold Metal Core

Target

7 Nicola Porro wrote Thursday in his comment on The Journal , noting that the opposition is not the problem in reality, the electoral law, but Berlusconi, and as he himself is the target of the whole 'operation: "The current electoral law is clearly crap. As said by many it was the old one the Matarellum. And as it was obviously that the Italians have canceled due to the referendum with pitchforks Mario Segni. Electoral laws in Italy are like clothes tailor with the passage of time become narrow, inadequate. If you do not want to take the piss there is only one system, very subjective to define a good electoral law in Italy: those are good rules of the game that allow us to play. The point is that every player has his own perspective, his grades and its many conveniences. " The point is all. As observed Porro: "From the logical point of view an electoral law is moving in a pendulum between stability and representation. In the midst of hundreds of small technical devices can further the interests of some and the others. "
Porro in his note highlights some issues where it's good to reflect, beginning Italian by the anomaly than the rest of the democratic West and in particular the Anglo-Saxon world. The Deputy Director of the Journal gives a few examples: "In England the Liberals have recently gained a lot of votes, not enough to govern, but necessary to elect a prime minister. No one asked to change the rules of the game: the parties have adjusted to the rules. " Second example: "In the U.S., even the chaos that led to the victory of George W. Bush has led to the modification of the complex electoral system. Nor is the great center requires that the polls stars and stripes to keep growing in day to peaks of 30 percent. " England, America ... but already we are Italians and so it is now all but Silvio Berlusconi and the League, asking the overcoming of the electoral law. Porro says: "The issue has become so vital that it could create an absurd coalition of the willing that you do not know under which sudden force (if not a common dislike for the Cav) to agree on electoral liquid. Furthermore, according to Porro, why throw in the trash "bullshit" of Calderoli are many, the option does not specify by name on the voters who elect the majority of the premium that many question. Remember
Porro in his piece that "the current electoral system has not been made a century ago, but voted exactly the same participants in the Parliament today. A change Mattarellum (the law that arose in the aftermath of the referendum marks) was the Freedom House, which in addition to the League and Forza Italy, had within it the National Alliance and UDC. What changed your mind and representatives Finian Casini if \u200b\u200bnot the fact that it is not now more allied with Berlusconi? "Quite evidently. It adds Porro discovered the sore point of all present and future opposition, "Out of all hypocrisy then we say the truth: we change this ugly election law that we helped to vote in order to reduce the weight of Berlusconi's coalition in the forthcoming elections. A few balls, please . Papal Pope: "The new law will not be better from this perspective, but Berlusconi free, 'says Porro, but what is obvious to every right-thinking in the face of the question as is given now by the opposition and future as such .
Porro finally remembers something that these days you hear just remember: "An attempt to change the porcellum there was: the referendum of Professor Guzzetta. A little 'how to score would have undermined the system of law. Just think 'by Franceschini, then a number of the PD, D'Alema, in Brunetta Prestigiacomo and they all agreed in the referendum. That shifted the majority of the premium to the party the most votes and eliminate multiple applications. Yet only 25 percent of Italians went to vote, a percentage so low as to break the outcome of the consultation. " Another ball is often heard from those who would back the people with pitchforks in the streets is so revealed. Porro notes: "Even out here in hypocrisy. Today, if someone says that the issue of electoral law is the fundamental theme heard and feel of the country must be four calculations with very little enthusiasm, with which the referendum was held only a couple of years ago. " Well, around there are those who consciously lies propaganda lies and confident the diversion of Italian militants and blind and deaf to all reason.
Regulating electoral means to decide on a set of rules that may be based on multiple solutions, which can range from encouraging the highest proportional representation with perfect focus on the maximum stability with the majority of the premium. We must, however, deal with reality. He says at the conclusion of his commentary Porro: "It's hard to think that a parliament by Fini D'Alema will be able to agree on the details of the rules." Yeah, and it is also clear that "one thing they can agree: how to get out of Berlusconi." So? "But let's not say so, and then for a ride." Good call, but unfortunately not the intellectual honesty is a commodity which has a market today.

Oster Osterizer Blender Cyclomatic Imperial

cheeks

On Manifesto, Tuesday 5 is a pop-interview with Antonio Di Pietro, leader of IDV. Two aspects make it interesting for the political debate. First, the net assessment of the electoral law and his cabal kept alive by the Democratic Party.
Says Peter: "We have one thing clear: I do not at the table I sat down," meaning the virtual table around which a majority would coagulating on an electoral law to be proposed in place of 'crap' in Calderoli. He explains: "For one thing, I fear that the new electoral law is an excuse to postpone the next three years to an unelected government. " More clearly than that, Di Pietro reveals the altars of Bersani and his clique unable to attract the consensus that it would be necessary in the case of elections to overturn a majority government. In short rule "by the grace of God ', or not to mix the sacred with the profane, by the grace of" companion "Napolitano. Hope often betrayed, showing a distorted thinking about the presidency not as a guarantor of all, and the like. A thought which, unfortunately, mutatis mutandis, is found in the hegemonic power of the center at each administrative level.
And because there are no misunderstandings Di Pietro states: "I support the amendment of electoral law, and to do so in this term, if there are conditions. And if the proposed law is worse than at present. " Yeah, nobody says it, but there is this danger should not be overlooked. It highlights the conditions: "If Berlusconi fall, and if it should create a new majority with this technical purposes only. But it is clear: a government in time, 90 days, with the guarantee of the head of state. " And not only that: "Alliance [with Finian]? For us there is no alliance. I would not go in this government. Do not betray my constituents. " Compared with the electorate, therefore, a clear idea of \u200b\u200bPeter and vote on whether or not: "I'm ready to consider any proposal in parliament. If they want our votes, the premier instructed to first say what the law wants to do. A pig in a poke do not vote at all. So our votes without a majority in parliament is not new. " A clear letter with return receipt for Bersani and his mania for hegemony in the center. The journalist
Manifesto, Daniela Preziosi, at this point, asked if a return to Di Pietro mattarellum could be a possible solution to the problem raised by democrat : "It may be a solution, is better than porcellum. We prefer the two-round majority, but we realize that an idea is a minority. So as proportional to the German. But since I know them, waiting for the concrete proposal. And before you say yes I will think twice. " Just to reiterate the concept indirectly, so that Fini can unseat the knight, but that takes for granted Bersani Di Pietro a Masonic 'obey' such as that of Garibaldi, known to history, there runs and then.
The second important issue concerns the UDC, Casini's party. Introduced by this account of the journalist: "The UDC goes on to say that she is instrumental to Berlusconi," the response of Peter: "You do not get the fox grape." For the IDV leader, the hypothesis of an alliance with the UDC, "is a unnecessary debate. " He explains: "Bersani listen to me: those of the UDC to think everything except the Democratic Party. The Democratic Party runs the moon below. I do not want to do with them the figure of the sexton who runs after a beautiful woman. The Democratic Party does not know which graze grass of the lawn: If we or the UDC. Will the end of the donkey of Buridan. Will die of hunger. "
speak with the journalist, Peter expresses his opinion on many issues related to the UDC, by Cuffaro, Sicily, the alliance "model Marche 'Like that of Enrico Letta. So Di Pietro: "Look, Cuffaro has made me a civil suit because I said that he has a problem with the Mafia. Today, the UDC has been released for this issue. Tomorrow, who knows. Cuffaro also because it has downloaded, but has allied himself with others less. I mean Lombardo. Lombardo is with them [the Democratic Party] in Sicily and with Berlusconi in Rome. Beautiful stuff. [And on the Marche, the alliance Pd, UDC, IDV:] is an incredible story. If we do not tell me that I'm losing the center. If you tell me that I'm with the UDC. In the Marches we did not want to be with them. Then the Democratic Party and insisted we have achieved this award: the relationship with the UDC if the president manages the region, we even have a coffee with them. To avoid another region to deliver the PDL, see Calabria. " And the idea of \u200b\u200bmaking the model Marche a national model, "I think not. The UDC is doing now operation after which the PD is likely to disappear. It will create the third prong, the former dc break. " It adds that those who today in the Democratic Party wants the alliance only with casinos, such as beds, Boccia, Fioroni and several others, eventually become part of the third pole. Requiem, therefore, for the democrat party . Moreover, speaking of the people then purple, among other things says: "There is a prairie of voters fleeing the traditional parties. There's something for everyone. Except for the Democratic Party, if it continues like this. " And for those who had ears to hear, last repetition, you never know which sounds the alarm: "This [accused of forcing people to violate the IDV] Bresso is like saying, I grillini lost because I do not have voted. But five years later you run the voters, look in the mirror and slap. " Already, some red cheek around would not hurt.